The Child’s Loss of Wildland

swing

We went to the park. I found it incredibly one dimensional. There was a climbing structure, shade trees, picnic tables, and a whole lot of grass. That’s the norm out here. Out in Georgia, many parks had forested areas, streams, rivers, or ponds, and certainly more than two types of plants. I miss the variety. A trip to such a full park would take up a few hours. After the play-structure got old, there was ducks to admire, frogs to find, flowers to pick, and streams to wade in.

There will probably never be quite as full parks as there was in Georgia. The climate doesn’t grow as many trees or include as many waterways. But  as I was sitting at this park, which became dull in a half-hour, I wondered how hard it would be to include some sort of  wilderness area or garden. I remember several parks growing up that included overgrown areas. We could explore there, enjoy forts made from sticks, find insects or birds, dig in the dirt a bit. One of those parks has recently undergone a transformation to “beautify” the place. Lawn replaced the areas that had long been ignored. And it ceases to become a place for exploration, but turns into a one-dimensional place that will only engage a child’s mind for so long.

Too often our yards and landscape mirror this trend. In my own yard, my sons does not spend his time playing on the grass. He watches the flowers emerging and blooming, he spends hours digging up dirt with shovels and dump trucks. He picks dandelions and weedy hyacinths.

Many in my community strive for long areas of green grass. There is no place for weeds, for shrubs and perennials. A good park or yard seems to be one that looks nice. But I go with my children and I miss the wild overgrowth that speaks so strongly to children to come explore. I doubt I’m going to convince anyone to let the weeds grow up…but maybe instead we can put in a garden. Flowers can come up and bring in insects. Shrubs and trees can provide homes to birds and make places for hiding and discovery. Children need more than lawn and climbing structures: they need nature they can interact in.

2 thoughts on “The Child’s Loss of Wildland

  1. heather says:
    heather's avatar

    This is why I don’t really need to landscape my yard–there may be no grass, but there are plenty of natural plants all around, and lizards, and rocks, and sand to dig in, and things to climb on, and stuff to do.

    Sometimes I wish for lawn and a swing set and some shrubs–but my yard right now, in all its desert glory, is much more fun for a child.

    Like

  2. Melissa Ashby says:
    Melissa Ashby's avatar

    So I guess I shouldn’t feel bad that my yard is basically overgrown? Maybe that’s why my kids enjoy it so much… at least they did until the dirt hill in the back got smoothed out in an effort to make it more “appealing.” In the city there’s not a lot of overgrowth, but Shane and I both grew up in the country, and I know exactly what you mean. Not so many trees, but we had ample room to run around and explore, create and imagine. My cousin and I used to spend hours and hours building and designing rock cities. Shane has similar stories. 🙂

    Like

Leave a comment